TeSys GV2ME vs GV3ME: Schneider Motor Circuit Breaker Comparison

By Abdullah Zahid
21 min read
Schneider Electric TeSys GV2ME and GV3ME thermal-magnetic motor circuit breakers side by side for industrial motor protection comparison

TeSys GV2ME vs GV3ME Motor Circuit Breakers: Selection Guide for Three-Phase Motor Protection

Controls engineers specifying motor protection for a new panel or retrofit face a direct choice between two thermal-magnetic manual motor starters within the same Schneider Electric ecosystem: the TeSys GV2ME and the TeSys GV3ME. Both deliver Class 10 bimetallic overload protection with integrated short-circuit protection, but they target fundamentally different current and power ranges — the TeSys GV2ME covering motors with full-load currents up to approximately 32 A, and the TeSys GV3ME extending that coverage to approximately 63 A and beyond in some IEC variants. Getting the frame selection right before procurement avoids costly panel redesigns, coordination failures, and nuisance trips in the field.

If you have already confirmed which frame fits your motor and fault level, check current pricing and availability for TeSys GV2ME and TeSys GV3ME at LeadTime.ca — ships worldwide.

Who Should Choose TeSys GV2ME — and Who Needs TeSys GV3ME?

Both devices are thermal-magnetic, three-pole manual motor controllers suitable for direct-on-line starters and group motor installations. The frame decision comes down to motor full-load current, available fault current at the installation point, and panel density requirements.

The TeSys GV2ME is the right choice if:

  • Motor full-load current falls comfortably within the GV2ME adjustable range (approximately 0.1–32 A across the catalog family)
  • Motor power is within the GV2ME family range — approximately 0.06–15 kW at 400/415 V AC-3, or up to about 20 HP at 460 V for higher-range catalog numbers
  • Available fault current and coordination studies confirm the GV2ME short-circuit rating (typically around 10 kA at 480 V for representative models) is adequate
  • Panel space is constrained and compact device density is a priority
  • The application calls for cost-effective standardized protection across many smaller motors

The TeSys GV3ME is the right choice if:

  • Motor full-load current is above GV2ME's upper limit — particularly in the 40–65 A range that falls within the GV3ME family
  • Motor power approaches 30–37 kW at 400/415 V, or up to about 40 HP at 460 V
  • Fault level calculations or coordination studies require higher short-circuit capacity than GV2ME typically provides — GV3ME offers around 50 kA at 480 V for representative models
  • The design calls for larger motor feeder sections in an MCC where higher-capacity devices are standard
  • Future motor upsizing is anticipated and specifying a larger frame now avoids a panel revision later

If your motor's full-load current or fault level falls into a grey zone between frames, contact the LeadTime.ca team before specifying — the answer depends on the exact catalog number, not just the family designation.

On this page:

What These Devices Actually Do in a Motor Control System

Both the TeSys GV2ME and TeSys GV3ME are thermal-magnetic motor circuit breakers and manual motor starters — two functions in a single device. The thermal element provides Class 10 bimetallic overload protection that trips on sustained overcurrent before motor insulation is damaged. The magnetic element responds to instantaneous short-circuit currents, clearing faults before upstream devices are stressed. A manual handle doubles as a local isolator, satisfying lockout-tagout requirements at the motor control panel.

Neither device includes network communication. They are standalone electromechanical protective devices. That simplicity is intentional — in direct-on-line starter applications, the GV2ME and GV3ME provide reliable protection without software configuration, firmware updates, or fieldbus addressing. The current setting is adjusted on a rotary dial calibrated in amperes, set to match the motor's full-load current nameplate value.

Both devices also carry UL listing as manual motor controllers, and both are suitable for group motor installation applications when applied per Schneider Electric's published guidelines. This makes them viable not only as standalone starters but as components within grouped motor control sections sharing upstream protection.

Typical System Architecture for TeSys GV Motor Starters

Understanding where the TeSys GV2ME or TeSys GV3ME sits in the signal and power chain helps clarify why frame selection affects the entire section, not just one device.

  • Incoming supply feeds through a main circuit breaker or fusible disconnect at the panel incomer — this device's interrupting rating must coordinate with the GV2ME or GV3ME below it.
  • The TeSys GV2ME or TeSys GV3ME is installed downstream as the motor branch protective device, providing short-circuit and overload protection in one package.
  • Where remote start/stop control is required, a TeSys Deca contactor is combined with the GV device to form a combination motor starter — this combination must be verified against Schneider's coordination tables for Type E or Type F rating.
  • Motor terminals connect directly from the GV device output (or contactor output) to the three-phase motor via appropriately sized conductors matched to the device's current range and terminal capacity.
  • Optional accessories — auxiliary contacts, shunt trip releases, or undervoltage releases — connect to the GV device and interface with the control circuit or safety system as required by the application.

Typical Applications Across Industries

In manufacturing environments — metalworking, plastics, food and beverage — TeSys GV2ME devices appear consistently on small conveyor drives, auger motors, and auxiliary equipment motors where full-load currents are well within the 32 A family maximum. The compact footprint allows high device density in machine panels where space is a premium.

Pumping and HVAC applications split between the two frames by motor size. Small circulating pumps, cooling fans, and ventilation motors often fall within GV2ME territory. Larger process pumps serving water treatment plants or central HVAC systems — operating at 30–37 kW at 400/415 V — align with the TeSys GV3ME range and its higher short-circuit ratings suited to the higher available fault currents common near utility incomer feeders.

In material handling and packaging lines, where panels contain multiple motors of varying sizes, the practical approach is to use GV2ME for motors within its range and introduce GV3ME only where current or fault level demands it. This split approach is common in OEM machine panels where standardizing on a single oversized frame would waste panel space and add unnecessary cost.

Water and wastewater facilities frequently operate medium-power pump motors in environments with higher available fault currents. Here the TeSys GV3ME's higher breaking capacity — approximately 50 kA at 480 V for representative models — provides the margin that fault level calculations require.

Application Typical Deployment
Small conveyor drive (7.5 kW, FLC ≈ 15 A) TeSys GV2ME — motor current and power within GV2ME family range, compact panel
Large process pump (30–37 kW, FLC ≈ 55–65 A) TeSys GV3ME — current exceeds GV2ME upper limit, higher breaking capacity required
Mixed-motor machine panel (0.75–11 kW motors) TeSys GV2ME throughout — all motors within GV2ME range, compact spacing preferred
MCC with medium motors near high-fault incomer (15–18 kW) TeSys GV3ME where fault level exceeds GV2ME SCCR; verify per exact catalog
Plant standardization up to 22 kW Split standard — GV2ME below defined current threshold, GV3ME above it
HVAC central fans and pumps (up to 40 HP at 460 V) TeSys GV3ME — aligns with higher-range GV3ME UL HP reference at 460 V

Head-to-Head Specifications: TeSys GV2ME vs TeSys GV3ME

Attribute TeSys GV2ME TeSys GV3ME
Protection type Thermal-magnetic, bimetallic overload, Class 10 Thermal-magnetic, bimetallic overload, Class 10
Adjustable current range (family-level) Approx. 0.1–32 A across GV2ME catalog numbers Approx. 9–63 A (up to around 80 A in some IEC GV3 variants)
Motor power range at 400/415 V AC-3 Approx. 0.06–15 kW depending on catalog number Approx. 4–30/37 kW depending on catalog number
UL motor power reference at 460 V Up to about 20 HP for higher-range GV2ME models Up to about 40 HP for higher-range GV3ME models
Poles 3P manual motor controller / breaker 3P manual motor controller / breaker
Typical short-circuit rating at 480 V (UL) Around 10 kA (exact value catalog-dependent) Around 50 kA (exact value catalog-dependent)
IEC breaking capacity at 415 V (Icu) Family range roughly 10–100 kA depending on model Higher Icu within GV3 family; exact values catalog-dependent
Frame size Smaller — suited to compact panels and small motors Larger — suited to higher-current motors and wider cable sizes
Group installation suitability Suitable per Schneider documentation Suitable per Schneider documentation
UL manual motor controller listing Yes Yes

All ranges in this table are family-level. Exact limits depend on the specific GV2ME or GV3ME catalog number, voltage, and utilization category. Full technical specifications are available on the product page at LeadTime.ca.

Attribute TeSys GV2ME TeSys GV3ME
Relative unit cost Lower — suitable for many small motors Higher — proportional to higher current and power capability
Panel space impact More compact, higher device density possible Larger footprint, reduced density but higher capacity per device
Cable and terminal sizing Suited to smaller conductor sizes Suited to larger conductors for higher currents
Combination rating with TeSys Deca contactor Type F combination per specified catalogs Type F combination per specified catalogs
Typical coordination focus Smaller motors, lower fault levels Larger motors, higher fault levels

If your motor's full-load current falls above GV2ME's approximately 32 A upper limit, the TeSys GV3ME is the correct frame — confirm current availability and catalog options at LeadTime.ca.

Short-Circuit Ratings, SCCR, and Fault Level Alignment

One of the most consequential differences between the TeSys GV2ME and TeSys GV3ME is short-circuit interrupting capacity. Schneider documentation indicates that representative GV2ME models carry a short-circuit rating of around 10 kA at 480 V under UL testing, while representative GV3ME models reach approximately 50 kA at 480 V. For IEC installations at 415 V, the GV2ME family spans a range of roughly 10–100 kA Icu depending on the specific catalog number, with GV3 family models positioned at higher Icu levels within that overall range. These are family-level indicators — the exact rating for any given catalog number must be confirmed against the manufacturer's datasheet.

In North American installations, the System Component Short Circuit Current Rating (SCCR) governs what fault current a motor starter combination can safely interrupt without presenting a hazard. Where available fault current at the panel is low — typical of many branch circuits well downstream of a transformer — GV2ME's rating is often adequate. As installations move closer to utility incomers, transformer secondaries, or large bus systems, available fault current rises, and the GV2ME's rating may no longer provide sufficient margin. That is the scenario where GV3ME's higher breaking capacity becomes the technically correct choice, independent of motor size.

The critical discipline is performing or obtaining actual fault level calculations at the installation point before selecting a frame. Relying on motor kW alone — without checking available fault current — is the most common cause of under-rated motor protection devices being installed in industrial plants.

Five Real-World Selection Scenarios

The following scenarios illustrate how motor current, power level, and fault conditions drive the frame decision in practice.

Scenario 1 — Small Conveyor Motor (7.5 kW at 400 V, FLC approximately 15 A, moderate fault level): Motor current is comfortably within the GV2ME adjustable range, motor power is well within the GV2ME family kW limits, and GV2ME's short-circuit rating is adequate in a typical small conveyor panel. TeSys GV2ME is the correct and more cost-effective choice.

Scenario 2 — Large Pump Motor (30–37 kW at 400 V, FLC approximately 55–65 A, higher fault level): Motor full-load current exceeds the GV2ME upper limit of approximately 32 A and falls within the TeSys GV3ME current range. Higher breaking capacity of GV3ME also aligns with the higher fault levels commonly seen on larger feeders. TeSys GV3ME is the required choice.

Scenario 3 — Mixed-Motor Panel in a Tight Enclosure (multiple motors from 0.75 kW to 11 kW): All motors fall within the GV2ME family range. The compact GV2ME frame allows more devices in limited enclosure space. GV2ME is the primary choice throughout; GV3ME would only be introduced for any individual circuit where current or fault requirements specifically demand it.

Scenario 4 — High-Fault-Level MCC with Medium Motors (15–18 kW motors, fault level near utility incomer): Motor current may fall within the GV2ME range, but high available fault current may demand breaking capacity above what GV2ME typically provides. Where coordination studies show GV2ME is marginal, TeSys GV3ME's higher short-circuit rating is the safer specification. Selection depends on confirmed fault current against the exact catalog SCCR value.

Scenario 5 — Plant Standardization for Motors up to 22 kW: For motors up to roughly 15 kW, TeSys GV2ME provides economical protection. For motors above 15 kW approaching 22 kW, standardizing on TeSys GV3ME provides margin and supports future motor upsizing. A split standard — GV2ME below a defined current threshold, GV3ME above it — often delivers the best balance of cost, simplicity, and safety across a plant fleet.

Coordination with TeSys Contactors and Combination Ratings

Neither the TeSys GV2ME nor the TeSys GV3ME includes a network communication port — both are standalone electromechanical devices. Control is achieved through the manual handle and optional electrical accessories. Where remote or automatic starting is required, a TeSys Deca contactor is combined with the GV device to form a combination motor starter.

Both TeSys GV2ME and TeSys GV3ME can be combined with TeSys Deca contactors to achieve Type F combination motor controller ratings per specified Schneider catalog references. Type E manual motor starter ratings are applicable for certain GV2 and GV3 variants. The specific combination rating — including the resulting SCCR and coordination class — must be verified using Schneider's published coordination tables for the exact GV catalog number and the selected contactor model. Assuming that any GV2 device coordinates with any TeSys contactor at a given fault level is a selection error; the combination must be confirmed against the manufacturer's documented coordination data.

Schneider Electric publishes design tools, catalogs, and application notes specifically for TeSys GV device selection and coordination. These documents, not informal guidance, are the authoritative reference for finalizing any GV2ME or GV3ME specification.

Accessories and Mechanical Integration: What Carries Over and What Doesn't

Both the TeSys GV2ME and TeSys GV3ME support a range of accessories that extend their function within a motor control panel. Auxiliary contacts — including early make and late break options — are available for both frames and integrate with PLC or relay control circuits to provide run feedback and fault signaling. Undervoltage and shunt trip releases are listed for both families, enabling remote trip functions from safety relays or emergency stop circuits. Rotary handles and door-mount kits are also available across the range, allowing the manual operator to be mounted on a panel door while the device remains on the DIN rail inside.

Where the frames diverge is in accessory interchangeability. GV2 and GV3 accessories are not cross-compatible. Auxiliary contacts, rotary handles, and trip releases are ordered specifically for either the GV2 or GV3 series. Ordering a GV2-type auxiliary contact for a GV3ME installation — or vice versa — is a documented procurement error that appears in both distributor Q&A data and field accounts. Always verify accessory compatibility tables against the exact frame before ordering.

Mechanical differences also affect panel layout planning. The TeSys GV3ME is physically larger than the TeSys GV2ME. In group installations where both frame sizes are used, spacing requirements, busbar ratings, and thermal clearances must be verified. Schneider's group installation guidelines govern the allowable configurations. Introducing GV3ME devices into an existing GV2-based group panel without reviewing these parameters is a layout risk.

Terminal options — screw, spring, and ring terminals — are available depending on the specific catalog number and frame. Verify terminal type and conductor size compatibility when finalizing the panel BOM, particularly when transitioning from GV2ME to GV3ME as conductor sizes increase with higher motor currents.

Expert Verdict: Which Frame for Which Application

For the large majority of small and medium three-phase motors in industrial panels — conveyors, small pumps, fans, auxiliary machine drives operating below approximately 15 kW at 400/415 V with full-load currents well within 32 A — the TeSys GV2ME is the technically sound and economically correct choice. Its compact footprint supports high device density in machine panels, its Class 10 bimetallic protection reliably covers the motor's thermal profile, and its unit cost is appropriate for applications where many identical motors are protected across a fleet. Schneider documentation confirms GV2ME's UL listing as a manual motor controller and its suitability for group installation, which are the two credentials most often required for North American panel certification.

The TeSys GV3ME is not a premium upgrade — it is a different tool for a different task. When motor full-load current moves into the 40–65 A range, or when fault level calculations show that approximately 10 kA at 480 V is no longer a sufficient breaking margin, the TeSys GV2ME is simply not the correct device regardless of cost considerations. GV3ME's approximately 50 kA short-circuit rating at 480 V for representative models addresses the fault environments common near transformer secondaries and large bus systems. For 30–37 kW motors at 400/415 V, or applications approaching 40 HP at 460 V, GV3ME is the documented choice in Schneider's own catalog. Hesitating to specify GV3ME on cost grounds when the application demands it creates a protection gap that no price saving justifies.

From a procurement standpoint, both TeSys GV2ME and TeSys GV3ME are established Schneider Electric product lines available through industrial distribution worldwide. GV2ME catalog numbers see broader everyday stock movement given the volume of small-motor applications; GV3ME availability for specific catalog numbers should be confirmed before committing to a panel schedule. Lead times vary by catalog number and regional stock levels — the most reliable way to confirm current availability, identify equivalent catalog options, and obtain project pricing is to work directly with a specialist distributor. Check current availability for both TeSys GV2ME and TeSys GV3ME catalog numbers at LeadTime.ca before finalizing your BOM.

For volume pricing, project-specific catalog number confirmation, or lead-time verification before committing to a panel build, contact the LeadTime.ca team directly — we ship worldwide.

What Engineers Are Saying About GV2ME and GV3ME in the Field

Across automation forums and distributor Q&A sections, the TeSys GV2 and GV3 product families consistently earn positive sentiment — with most field issues traced to application and selection errors rather than any intrinsic product deficiency. Engineers working with TeSys GV2ME repeatedly cite its reliable thermal-magnetic protection for small and medium motors, straightforward current dial adjustment, and compact footprint as practical strengths in machine-building and panel standardization. Those who have committed to the Schneider TeSys ecosystem tend to stay with it, which explains why the most common GV-related discussion is not whether to use TeSys GV at all, but where to draw the line between the GV2ME and GV3ME frames.

Nuisance tripping is the most frequently reported complaint on the GV2ME side, and field accounts make clear the root cause: current settings miscalculated or set conservatively below the motor's full-load current, often by engineers who confuse service factor current with nameplate FLC. A separate pattern emerges around borderline motor sizes — engineers uncertain whether a motor sitting near the upper end of the GV2ME range should stay on GV2ME or move to GV3ME. Community contributors are consistent in their answer: do the full-load current calculation, compare it against the adjustable range of the specific catalog number, and do not rely on kW nameplate alone. On the GV3ME side, the recurring feedback is that the larger frame can make dense panel layouts more challenging, and the higher unit cost prompts engineers to question whether GV3ME is truly necessary for motors that are technically borderline. Fault level data, community contributors note, is what settles that question — not cost.

Switching stories in these communities follow a consistent pattern: teams that standardized on GV2ME for all motors later encounter a motor upsizing situation and discover that GV3ME's larger footprint requires panel redesign. The lesson reported by engineers who have gone through this process is to define a current threshold at the design stage — use GV2ME below it, GV3ME above it — rather than defaulting to one frame and retrofitting later. A secondary theme involves accessories: multiple accounts mention ordering GV2-type auxiliary contacts for a GV3ME device (or the reverse) because the accessory part number was pulled from a previous project without frame verification. Both communities and distributors flag this as an avoidable ordering error, one that delays commissioning when the wrong accessory arrives on site.

Wiring and Installation Overview

  • The TeSys GV2ME and TeSys GV3ME are three-pole devices; all three line conductors must be connected per the device's terminal ratings — conductor sizes must be matched to the motor's full-load current and the device's published terminal capacity for the specific catalog number.
  • The adjustable current dial must be set to match the motor's nameplate full-load current before energizing — do not set conservatively below the motor FLC, as this is the documented cause of nuisance tripping under normal motor starting conditions.
  • For group motor installations, review Schneider's published group installation guidelines for spacing requirements, busbar ratings, and thermal clearances before mounting multiple GV2ME or GV3ME devices on a common busbar system.
  • Accessories — auxiliary contacts, shunt trip releases, undervoltage releases — are frame-specific and must be confirmed for GV2 or GV3 compatibility before installation; verify accessory catalog numbers against the installed device frame.
  • Before commissioning, verify that the device's short-circuit rating matches or exceeds the calculated available fault current at the installation point; do not energize a panel section where this check has not been completed and documented.

Switching Between GV2ME and GV3ME: What Changes

Upgrading from TeSys GV2ME to TeSys GV3ME in an existing panel is the most common migration scenario — typically triggered by a motor upsizing, an increase in available fault current following electrical infrastructure changes, or a plant standardization initiative. The transition has implications beyond replacing the device itself.

Conductor sizes will increase with higher motor currents in the GV3ME range. Cable routes, conduit fill, and terminal lugs must be reviewed against the new current levels. The GV3ME's physically larger footprint will change the spacing in the panel section — existing din rail arrangements, adjacent devices, and busbar connections must be re-evaluated. Coordination studies with upstream breakers must be reconfirmed for the new device catalog number, as the coordination table that was valid for a specific GV2ME model does not automatically transfer to the GV3ME replacement.

Accessories from the GV2 installation — auxiliary contacts, door handles, trip releases — do not carry forward. GV3-compatible accessories must be specified and ordered separately. If the installation included a combination starter with a TeSys Deca contactor, the Type F combination rating must be re-verified using Schneider's coordination tables for the GV3ME catalog number and the contactor model.

Moving in the reverse direction — from GV3ME down to GV2ME following a motor downsizing or reconfigured panel — is straightforward only if the replacement motor's full-load current and the updated fault level calculations both fall within the GV2ME frame's limits. Verify both conditions before downsizing the device; do not assume that a smaller motor automatically qualifies for GV2ME without confirming the fault level at the installation point remains within GV2ME's breaking capacity.

Wrong-Part Prevention Checklist

Before finalizing any GV2ME or GV3ME catalog number for procurement, confirm each of the following against your motor data and system documentation:

  1. Verify motor full-load current and ensure it lies within the adjustable range of the selected GV2ME or GV3ME catalog number.
  2. Confirm breaking capacity / SCCR of the exact GV2ME or GV3ME device against the calculated or specified fault level at the installation point.
  3. Check motor voltage and utilization category (e.g. AC-3 at 400/415 V) against catalog motor power ratings for the chosen frame.
  4. Ensure compatibility with the selected TeSys Deca contactor or starter combination and follow Schneider coordination tables.
  5. Verify that ambient compensation, trip class (Class 10 bimetallic), and derating rules are acceptable for the operating environment.
  6. Confirm that available accessories (aux contacts, releases, mounting kits) match the chosen frame size (GV2 vs GV3).
  7. Avoid mixing GV2ME and GV3ME in tight group installations without checking spacing, busbar systems, and thermal clearances.

If any item on this checklist cannot be confirmed from available documentation, contact the LeadTime.ca team before ordering — getting the catalog number right the first time avoids costly returns, project delays, and protection gaps on live equipment.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I use a TeSys GV2ME for a 22 kW motor at 400 V?

In most cases, no. The TeSys GV2ME family covers motors up to approximately 15 kW at 400/415 V AC-3 depending on the catalog number, with full-load currents up to approximately 32 A across the family. A 22 kW motor at 400 V will typically have a full-load current that exceeds the GV2ME upper adjustable limit. The TeSys GV3ME, which extends motor power coverage to approximately 30–37 kW at 400/415 V, is the appropriate frame for that application. Verify the motor's actual full-load current against the specific catalog number's adjustable range before specifying.

What is the main practical difference in short-circuit protection between GV2ME and GV3ME?

Schneider documentation indicates that representative TeSys GV2ME models carry a short-circuit rating of around 10 kA at 480 V, while representative TeSys GV3ME models reach approximately 50 kA at 480 V. This difference is significant in applications where available fault current at the panel is high — for example, near transformer secondaries or large bus systems. Where fault level calculations show that GV2ME's interrupting rating is marginal or insufficient, GV3ME is the documented solution. Always verify exact SCCR values for the specific catalog number against the calculated fault current at the installation point.

Do TeSys GV2ME and GV3ME share accessories?

No. Accessories are frame-specific. Auxiliary contacts, rotary handles, door-mount kits, shunt trip releases, and undervoltage releases are listed separately for the GV2 and GV3 series. Ordering a GV2-type accessory for a GV3ME device — or vice versa — is a documented procurement mistake. Always verify accessory compatibility tables against the exact frame size before ordering.

Can both GV2ME and GV3ME be used in group motor installations?

Yes. Both the TeSys GV2ME and TeSys GV3ME are suitable for group motor installation applications when applied per Schneider Electric's published guidelines. When mixing both frame sizes in the same group panel, spacing requirements, busbar ratings, and thermal clearances must be reviewed for each frame. Do not introduce GV3ME devices into an existing GV2-based group installation without reviewing Schneider's mechanical and electrical group installation requirements for the combined layout.

How do I determine whether my fault level requires GV3ME instead of GV2ME?

Obtain or perform a fault current calculation at the installation point — specifically the available prospective short-circuit current at the terminals where the GV device will be installed. Compare this value against the published short-circuit rating (Icu for IEC, SCCR for UL) of the specific GV2ME or GV3ME catalog number under consideration. If the available fault current exceeds GV2ME's rating for that catalog number, TeSys GV3ME with its higher breaking capacity is required. This calculation must be performed for each installation point — do not assume a family-level rating applies to every variant or location.

Are GV2ME and GV3ME UL listed as manual motor controllers?

Yes. Schneider documentation confirms that both GV2 and GV3 manual starters and protectors are UL listed as manual motor controllers. Both families are also noted as suitable for group installation applications when used per manufacturer guidelines. Confirm the UL listing for the specific catalog number and intended application during the panel certification review.

What coordination documents should I consult before finalizing GV2ME or GV3ME selection?

Schneider Electric publishes coordination tables and application notes specifically for TeSys GV devices, covering short-circuit ratings, combination motor starter configurations with TeSys Deca contactors, and group installation guidelines. The TeSys GV Catalogue and the Manual Motor Starters and Protectors documentation from Schneider's product information portal are the primary references. These documents govern Type E and Type F combination ratings and must be consulted before specifying any GV2ME or GV3ME in a combination motor starter arrangement.

Why Order from LeadTime.ca

  • LeadTime.ca ships TeSys GV2ME and TeSys GV3ME catalog numbers worldwide — no single-region restriction on sourcing.
  • Specialist distributor support for confirming catalog number accuracy, frame-specific accessory compatibility, and lead times before you commit to a panel schedule.
  • Access to current pricing and availability for both GV2ME and GV3ME variants, including catalog numbers that see lower everyday stock movement.
  • Volume pricing available for project and OEM quantities — contact the team directly for project-specific quotes.
  • Fast response for availability checks on specific catalog numbers where lead time matters to a panel build schedule.

At-a-Glance Summary

  • TeSys GV2ME covers motors with full-load currents up to approximately 32 A and motor powers to approximately 15 kW at 400/415 V AC-3 depending on catalog number.
  • TeSys GV3ME extends coverage to approximately 63 A (and up to around 80 A in some IEC variants) and motor powers to approximately 30–37 kW at 400/415 V depending on catalog number.
  • UL motor power references: TeSys GV2ME up to about 20 HP at 460 V; TeSys GV3ME up to about 40 HP at 460 V for higher-range models.
  • Short-circuit ratings differ significantly: approximately 10 kA at 480 V for representative GV2ME models versus approximately 50 kA at 480 V for representative GV3ME models.
  • Both devices use Class 10 bimetallic overload protection and are UL listed as manual motor controllers suitable for group installation.
  • Both frames combine with TeSys Deca contactors for Type F combination motor controller ratings — per Schneider's published coordination tables for the specific catalog numbers used.
  • Accessories are frame-specific — GV2 and GV3 accessories are not interchangeable.
  • Frame selection must be based on motor full-load current, available fault current at the installation point, and coordination requirements — not motor kW nameplate alone.
  • A split standard using TeSys GV2ME below a defined current threshold and TeSys GV3ME above it is a documented best practice for mixed-motor panels and plant standardization projects.

You may also be interested in: